Monday, 18 February 2019

A Royal Commission into the abuse of preople with disabilities

has been proposed by a Greens Senator who identifies as disabled.
I have little sympathy with the Greens as a party. Their website is full of policies that would simply never work. One senior member of the  Greens once went as far as to admit to me that, while the policies were what they would like, they knew they would never get them.
I don't know whether they will get the Royal Commission either.
The difficulty is that, although the Federal government is in favour of the idea, the states would have to come on board because services to people with disabilities are largely run by the states. I have a feeling that, given the record of the states, the idea may not be popular. 
But this is one Royal Commission I would like to see happen. It is long overdue. 
I have given evidence to more than one inquiry that has supposedly had the power to investigate some issues but nothing has come of those investigations. "Policy" announcements have been made but nothing has happened. What has happened is that "squeaky wheels" pushing their own agenda - all too often disguised as "equal opportunity" - have sometimes managed to achieve what they want but they have left the majority behind. 
There have been people who have spent years trying to ensure that transport services have, at very least, been retained. Yes, we now have a fleet of "accessible" buses - but there are still people who cannot access them. For them the transport fight isn't over but there is a belief, even in the disability sector, that the fight is all but over. There has been a push to have all children with disabilities "integrated" into the normal school system. That's been fine for some children but nobody has  yet taken a good hard look at the real consequences of this policy. Nobody has yet acknowledged that, without the specialist education some of these children might have received, they are simply not achieving what they might once have achieved. Nobody wants to acknowledge that the cost of truly integrating some children is so much higher than simply placing them in a classroom with a little bit of "support". 
Nobody has acknowledged that some of those who once went to "sheltered" workshops now have nowhere to go. There is a failure to acknowledge the "niche" roles they might once have filled in the general workforce have been taken over by others - if they even exist.
Moving people out of institutions into the community has not stopped abuse either. In all likelihood it has actually increased it. My own observations tell me that many people with disabilities who live in these group houses are even more isolated than before. The quality of care they are getting is not getting the scrutiny it should get. 
More than once person has said that how we treat the most vulnerable members of society is a reflection of society itself. We aren't doing as well as we should.
I'll support a Royal Commission because I am one of the lucky ones.  If you can't communicate, you can't complain - and I hope I can communicate.

1 comment:

Jodiebodie said...

Sheltered workshops = exploitation until they are prepared to pay a reasonable, liveable hourly rate for the same effort as any other non-disabled worker. If they are filling a niche, let the workers be paid top dollar as is the case with other niche marketing areas. Buyers pay high prices for niche items.

The problem is that the organisations that run sheltered workshops don't pay people with disabilities a decent wage. At the same time I expect there are organisations registered as charities that possibly don't pay the same taxes as other businesses either. No excuses for exploitation of the vulnerable.

The Terms of Reference for the Royal Commission need to be very broad to include private homes and schools, health services etc. as well as group homes and institutionalised care settings.

The ToR also need to be set by people with disabilities themselves and not by their able-bodied support service providers which have a vested interest.

Were the Catholic Church involved in setting the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into institutional responses into childhood sexual abuse?

Did government ask the banks to be in charge of setting the ToR for the banking Royal Commission?

Let's see how serious our governments truly are about equity for people with disabilities and upholding human rights.